Apr
21
Constructionism vs. Instructionism
April 21, 2008 | | Leave a Comment
I recently read the transcript of a speech given by Seymour Papert via video conference to educators in Japan. In his speech he discusses the difference between constructionism and instructionism, stating that technology can enhance the way children learn, rather than simply enhancing teacher instruction. He relates this to children learning mathematics at school. Learning for children (especially in mathematics) needs to be grounded in the real world, and therefore relevant. If children are simply rote learning mathematical formulas and equations on paper then it has no relevance to them. We need to show children that scientists, bankers, engineers and a multitude of other professions use mathematics everyday. And technology can help us do this. Papert gives examples of children creating calenders and even pictures – the theory behind which is grounded in mathematics. But the children are stimulated and interested. This speech was given in the 1980’s, and technology has come so far since then – imagine all the new programs we have access to now in 2008. Children need to be able to use knowledge, not just learn it, and technology is a great way to start.
Comments
Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)You must be logged in to post a comment.
